Munda Folktales of Jharkhand

A Study in Sociocultural Discourse

Authors

  • Laxmi Kumari
  • Md. Mojibur Rahman Associate Professor, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad, Jharkhand (India).

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17722/jell.v14i2.1174

Keywords:

Discourse Analysis, Folktales, Sociocultural, indigenous

Abstract

The present study aims at discourse analysis of Mundari Folktales of Jharkhand using sociocultural features. Discourse Analysis acts as an umbrella term for a rapidly growing field of research covering a wide range of different theoretical approaches and analytical emphases. It is assumed that different constructions of the world are represented in a number of ways. To understand different constructions, one needs to understand the factors that drive and shape the behavior of the people as individuals and collectively. The sociocultural discourse analysis focuses on the use of language as a social mode of thinking. The work of sociocultural theory is to explain how individual mental functioning is related to cultural, institutional, and historical context. This method will not only analyze words, sentences, expression, form and meaning but also analyze all kinds of social and cultural factors related to discourse. The intention behind the study is contribution to the repertoire of knowledge on Mundari folktales as an area which has remained unexplored over years. Despite being one of the major tribes of Jharkhand, these indigenous lives have not been a part of scholarly research yet. The tales are collected by different people and they are translated also but discourse study of the tales has not been dealt yet. Through the study of the tales one can learn their customs, culture, rituals, social activities and way of living. The emphases will be on analyzing people, their culture and society through the language used in the text.

References

Abrams, M. H., & Harpham, G. G. (2005). A glossary of Literary Terms. Wadsworth Cengage Learning. 25 Thomson‟ s place, Boston, USA. MA02210, USA.

Berger, P., & Heidemann, F. (2013). The modern anthropology of India: Ethnography, themes and theory. London: Routledge.

Data Highlights: The Scheduled Tribes Census of India 2001. (n.d.). Retrieved April 18, 2018, from http://www.bing.com/cr?IG=EA5BBD1BF5F04F558A8036C7D1F8041F&CID=16B9AB80358C6683327FA0553423679C&rd=1&h=hUpp5hIyNxqFae9JUOZhckJeqAjgWsVt_U0d0p7sEN8&v=1&r=http://censusindia.gov.in/Tables_Published/SCST/dh_st_jharkhand.pdf&p=DevEx,5067.1

De Saussure, F. (2011). Course in general linguistics. Columbia University Press.

Dundes, A. ed. 2011. Varia folklorica. Walter de Gruyter

Ethnography of Mundas. (n.d.). Retrieved April 1, 2018, from http://adivasiawaz.com/pdf/mundas.pdf

Furtado, S. (2013, November 03). Tribal Festivals with special reference to Jharkhand. Retrieved April 09, 2018, from https://www.speakingtree.in/blog/tribal-festivals-with-special-reference-to-jharkhand

Minz, D. and Hansda, D.M. 2010. Encyclopaedia of Scheduled Tribes in Jharkhand. Gyan Publishing House.

Mukhopadhyay, B. 2006. “Cultural studies and politics in India today” Theory, culture & society, 23(7-8), 279-292.

Penuel, W. R., & Wertsch, J. V. (1995). Vygotsky and identity formation: A sociocultural approach. Educational psychologist, 30(2), 83-92.

Richland, J. B. 2013. “Tribal Culture and Economic Growth”, PERC, 32(2) [online]. Available at: https://www.perc.org/2013/12/04/tribal-culture-and-economic-growth/ (Accessed: 15 January 2020)

Roy, S. C. (2010). The Mundas and their country. Ranchi: Crown Publications.

Singh, K.S. 1992. “The Munda Epic: An Interpretation”, India International Centre Quarterly, 19(1/2), 75-89.

Trigunayat, J. (1968). Munda Lok Kathayein. Ranchi.

Published

2020-10-31

How to Cite

Kumari, L., & Rahman, M. M. (2020). Munda Folktales of Jharkhand: A Study in Sociocultural Discourse. Journal of English Language and Literature, 14(2), 1268-1276. https://doi.org/10.17722/jell.v14i2.1174